Diversispora spurca

(C.M. Pfeiff., C. Walker & Bloss) C. Walker & Schuessler


SPORES borne singly in the soil; hyaline to pale yellow (4A3); globose to subglobose; (75-)86(-110) µm diam; with one subtending hypha.

 

 


SUBCELLULAR STRUCTURE OF SPORES consists of one wall with three layers (swl1-3).

In PVLG+Melzer's reagent
In PVLG
Layer 1, forming the spore surface, granular or mucilaginous in young spores, becoming more compact with age, hyaline to pale yellow (4A3), 0.5-1.0 µm thick, inseparable from layer 2, usually present even in older spores.

Layer 2 permanent, flexible, hyaline to pale yellow (4A3), (0.9-)1.0(-1.2) µm thick, frequently ballooning in lactic acid-based mountants.

Layer 3 laminate, hyaline, smooth, (1.6-)4.5(-5.4) µm thick, composed of very thin, <0.5 µm thick, tightly adherent sublayers, sometimes separating in vigorously crushed spores.

None of the spore wall layers stains in Melzer’s reagent.

Most juvenile spores hyaline, with a two-layered wall, each ca. 0.5 µm thick.

Spores from Dr. C. Walker in PVLG
Spores from Dr. C. Walker in PVLG+Melzer's reagent

In PVLG+Melzer's reagent
SUBTENDING HYPHA hyaline to pale yellow (4A3); straight or recurvate; cylindrical; (4.3-)5.6(-7.8) µm wide at the spore base.

Wall of subtending hypha hyaline to pale yellow (4A3); (0.9-)1.0(-1.3) µm thick at the spore base; composed of two layers (shwl1 and 2), continuous with spore wall layers 1 and 2; layer 2 of the spore wall extends along layer 1 of the subtending hyphal wall only very closely at the spore base.

Pore 2.9-7.6 µm diam, occluded by a thin septum or a plug.


GERMINATION. Not observed.


MYCORRHIZAE. Many attempts to establish mycorrhizae of D. spurca in one-species pot cultures with Plantago lanceolata L. as the plant host failed. According to Morton (2002) and Pfeiffer et al. (1996), the mycorrhizae of D. spurca (considered as Glomus spurcum) consisted of arbuscules and intraradical hyphae staining with variable intensity (from almost invisible to dark). No vesicles were found.


PHYLOGENETIC POSITION. According to Walker and Schüßler (2004), D. spurca is the type and so far the only species of the genus Diversispora in the family Diversisporaceae. However, results of molecular analyses indicated that other described species of arbuscular fungi grouping within the Diversispora clade are Gl. aurantium and Gl. versiforme (Blaszkowski 2003; Blaszkowski et al. 2004; Redecker et al. 2007; Schwarzott et al. 2001).


DISTRIBUTION. In Poland, spores of D. spurca were first found in three trap cultures with root-rhizosphere soils of Beta vulgaris L. and Triticum aestivum L. cultivated in Drzemin (53º15’N, 14º39’E), Kolbacz (53o18’N, 14o49’E), and Stobno (53º26’N, 14º23’E) in the Western Pomerania district (Blaszkowski et al. 2003; Iwaniuk and Blaszkowski 2004a, b). Subsequently, this fungus was revealed in many trap cultures containing root-rhizosphere mixtures taken from under Corynephorus canescens (L.) P. Beuv., Elymus arenarius L., Eryngium maritimum L., Festuca rubra L., Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud., Rubus fructicosus L. nom. Ambig., and Salix sp. colonizing maritime dunes adjacent to Darlówko (54º26’N, 16º23’E) adjacent to the Baltic Sea.

Diversispora spurca has originally been discovered as Gl. spurcum in a greenhouse bed of sand used for propagation of various ornamental plants cultivated in Arizona (Pfeiffer et al. 1996). This fungus has also been found in maritime dunes of Mexico (Pfeiffer et al. 1996), Hawaii (Koske and Gemma 1996), San Miguel Island, California (Koske, pers. inform.), as well as in different other natural ecosystems of North America, Cuba and Namibia, Africa (Kennedy et al. 1999; Stutz and Morton 1996; Stutz et al. 2000).


NOTES. The new combination D. spurca has been erected from Gl. spurcum mainly based on the molecular separateness of this fungus from other members of the genus Glomus (Walker and Schüßler 2004).

The spore wall layer 1 of D. spurca characterized here has been not included in the spore wall structure of this fungus in any earlier its description (Blaszkowski et al. 2003; Kennedy et al. 1999; Pfeiffer et al. 1996), although the presence of this structure has been mentioned. Pfeiffer et al. (1996) considered it to be a mucilaginous material formed by overlapping plate-like structures when examined with a scanning electron microscope. According to Kennedy et al. (1999), it rather is an accumulation of organic matter, because it does not stain in Melzer's reagent as a typical mucilaginous layer. The wall layer 1 of D. spurca spores examined by the author of this website occurred in almost all the specimens of this fungus coming from both Poland and those received from Dr. C. Walker, U. K.

The distinctive morphological characters of D. spurca are its hyaline to light-coloured, 3-layered spores and the second spore wall layer frequently swelling in lactic acid-based mountants.

The species of arbuscular fungi forming glomoid spores most similar to those of D. spurca in colour and size are Gl. eburneum, Gl. gibbosum, Gl. viscosum, and Paraglomus occultum. However, of them, only spores of the two later species have a 3-layered spore wall (Morton 2002; Morton and Redecker 2001; Walker 1982), as spores of D. spurca have. Moreover, none of these layers in the three fungi stains in Melzer's reagent. While the second spore wall layer of D. spurca frequently swells in lactic acid-based mountants and, thereby, separates from the laminate innermost layer of this wall, none of the spore wall layers of the two latter species swells in such mountants and separates from each other. Additionally, in the spore wall of D. spurca and Gl. viscosum, only one laminate layer occurs (Blaszkowski 2003; Kennedy et al. 1999; Morton 2002; Pfeiffer et al. 1996; Walker et al. 1995). In contrast, the spore wall of Par. occultum comprises two laminate layers (Morton and Redecker 2001).

The second spore wall layer of Gl. gibbosum also frequently swells in lactic acid-based mountants and overlies a laminate, hyaline layer of a thickness similar to that of the third laminate, hyaline innermost spore wall layer of D. spurca (Blaszkowski 1997, 2003). However, in the spore wall of the former species, a forth flexible innermost layer is still present, whose the latter fungus does not differentiate at al. Additionally, spores of D. spurca occur singly in the soil, and Gl. gibbosum produces spores singly, in loose aggregates, and in conglomerations completely enclosed by a hyphal mantle.

The spore wall of Gl. eburneum consists of only two tightly adherent layers (Kennedy et al. 1999; Morton 2002), and not of three layers, of which the second one is loosely associated with the third spore wall layer of D. spurca.

Glomus albidum, still another species that may be confused with D. spurca, also forms hyaline to pale-coloured spores (Walker and Rhodes 1981). However, they may be markedly larger [(85-)95-168(-198) x (85-)95-168(-177) µm vs. (75-)86(-110) µm diam when globose in D. spurca; Blaszkowski 2003] and their wall consists of only two layers of an equal thickness (vs. three layers different in thickness).

As mentioned in the section “Phylogenetic position”, other described members of the Glomeromycota closely related molecularly to D. spurca are Gl. aurantium and Gl. versiforme (Redecker et al. 2007; Schwarzott et al. 2001). However, the latter two species never form hyaline spores and their mature specimens are markedly darker-coloured [yellowish white (4A2) to golden yellow (5B8) and pale yellow (3A3) to deep yellow (4A8) in Gl. aurantium and Gl. versiforme, respectively; Blaszkowski 2003; Blaszkowski et al. 2004] than those of D. spurca [hyaline to pale yellow (4A3); Blaszkowski 2003]. Additionally, although the spore wall of Gl. aurantium is 3-layered and the layer overlaying the laminate one of this wall swells in lactic acid-based mountants, similarly to the second spore wall layer of D. spurca, the third and innermost component of the spore wall of the former species is a flexible, hyaline layer, which is lacking in the spore wall of the latter fungus. The third innermost spore wall component of D. spurca is a laminate layer. Thus, Gl. aurantium does not differentiate the first spore wall layer of D. spurca.


REFERENCES

Blaszkowski J. 1997. Glomus gibbosum, a new species from Poland. Mycologia 89, 339-345.

Blaszkowski J. 2003. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota), Endogone and Complexipes species deposited in the Department of Plant Pathology, University of Agriculture in Szczecin, Poland. http://www.agro.ar.szczecin.pl/~jblaszkowski/.

Blaszkowski J., Adamska I., Czerniawska B. 2003. Glomus claroideum and G. spurcum, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota) new for Poland and Europe, respectively. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 72, 149-156.

Blaszkowski J., Blanke V., Renker C., Buscot F. 2004. Glomus aurantium and G. xanthium, new species in Glomeromycota. 90, 447-467.

Kennedy L. J., Stutz J. C., Morton J. B. 1999. Glomus eburneum and G. luteum, two new species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, with emendation of G. spurcum. Mycologia 91, 1083-1093.

Koske R. E., Gemma J. N. 1996. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Hawaiian sand dunes: Island of Kaua’i. Pacific Sci. 50, 36-45.

Iwaniuk A., Blaszkowski J. 2004. Arbuscular fungi and mycorrhizae of agricultural soils of the Western Pomerania. Part I. Occurrence of arbuscular fungi and mycorrhizae. Acta Mycol. 39(1), 59-84.

Iwaniuk A., Blaszkowski J. 2004. Arbuscular fungi and mycorrhizae of agricultural soils of the Western Pomerania. Part II. Distribution of arbuscular fungi. Acta Mycol. 39(2), 3-18.

Morton J. B. 2002. International Culture Collection of Arbuscular and Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. West Virginia University. http://www.invam.caf.wvu.edu/.

Morton J. B., Redecker D. 2001. Two families of Glomales, Archaeosporaceae and Paraglomaceae, with two new genera Archaeospora and Paraglomus, based on concordant molecular and morphological characters. Mycologia 93, 181-195.

Pfeiffer C. M., Walker C., Bloss H. E. 1996. Glomus spurcum: a new endomycorrhizal fungus from Arizona. Mycotaxon 59, 373-382.

Redecker D., Raab P., Oehl F., Camacho F. J., Courtecuisse R. 2007. A novel clade of sporocarp-forming species of glomeromycotan fungi in the Diversisporales lineage. Mycol. Progress 6, 35-44.

Schwarzott D., Walker C., Schüßler A. 2001. Glomus, the largest genus of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomales) is nonmonophyletic. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 21, 190-197.

Stutz J. C., Morton J. B. 1996. Successive pot cultures reveal high species richness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in arid ecosystems. Can. J. Bot. 74, 1883-1889.

Stutz J. C., Copeman R., Martin C. A., Morton J. B. 2000. Patterns of species composition and distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in arid regions of southwestern North America and Namibia, Africa. Can. J. Bot. 78, 237-245.

Walker C. 1982. Species in the Endogonaceae: a new species (Glomus occultum) and a new combination (Glomus geosporum). Mycotaxon 15, 49-61.

Walker C., Giovannetti M., Avio L., Citernesi A. S., Nicolson T. H. 1995. A new fungal species forming arbuscular mycorrhizas: Glomus viscosum. Mycol. Res. 99, 1500-1506.

Walker C., Rhodes L. H. 1981. Glomus albidus: a new species in the Endogonaceae. Mycotaxon 12, 509-514.

Walker C., Schüßler A. 2004. Nomenclatural clarifications and new taxa in the Glomeromycota. Mycol. Res. 108, 979-982.